Week In Review
- Elissa D. Hecker - Editor
- Mar 24
- 29 min read
By Celine Agard
Edited By Elissa D. Hecker
Entertainment
Investigation Into Leaked Eminem Recordings Reveals an Inside Job — Federal Charges Now Being Filed
Joseph Strange, a former sound engineer for Eminem, is facing federal charges for allegedly stealing and selling the rapper's unreleased music. Strange, who worked for Eminem from 2007 to 2021, reportedly sold the music over the internet, leading to leaks. The FBI launched an investigation after staff at Eminem's studio discovered the stolen music online. Strange is charged with criminal copyright infringement and interstate transportation of stolen goods. During a search of his home, agents found unreleased music and other items related to Eminem's work. Eminem's team expressed gratitude for the FBI's investigation, emphasizing the damage caused to his artistic legacy and the importance of protecting intellectual property from exploitation.
Mariah Carey Wins Copyright Case Over Christmas hit
Mariah Carey was cleared of copyright infringement in a lawsuit filed by songwriter Adam Stone, who claimed her 1994 hit "All I Want for Christmas Is You" copied his 1989 song of the same name. Stone, performing as Vince Vance, sought $20 million in damages and alleged that Carey exploited his "popularity" and "style." However, U.S. District Judge Mónica Ramírez Almadani ruled that the two songs only shared common "Christmas song clichés" and that Stone had not demonstrated substantial similarities between the tracks. The judge also criticized Stone's legal team for filing "frivolous" claims, ordering them to repay Carey's legal costs. Stone's claim was refiled after being dropped in 2022, but expert testimony and musicological reports supported Carey’s defense, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Hollywood Filmmaker Charged With $11 Million Conspiracy to Defraud Netflix
Carl Erik Rinsch, a filmmaker hired by Netflix to produce a science-fiction series called "Conquest," has been charged with an $11 million fraud scheme. Prosecutors allege that Rinsch misappropriated funds meant for the show's production between 2018 and 2020, using the money for personal investments and trading securities instead. Netflix canceled the series in early 2021 after Rinsch exhibited erratic behavior, including claiming to have discovered Covid-19’s transmission mechanism and predicting natural disasters. Despite the lavish purchases Rinsch made with the remaining funds, including luxury cars and furniture, an arbitrator ruled that none were needed for production. Netflix ultimately lost $55 million on the project.
Universal Music Calls Drake’s ‘Not Like Us’ Lawsuit ‘Misguided’
Universal Music Group (UMG), the label behind Drake and Kendrick Lamar, filed a motion to dismiss Drake’s defamation lawsuit over Lamar’s diss track, "Not Like Us," arguing that the song’s hyperbolic insults were typical in rap battles and not intended to be factual. Drake sued UMG, claiming the track falsely labeled him a criminal pedophile, leading to real-world violence. UMG countered that diss tracks are meant to provoke and should not be considered defamatory. The label emphasized the satirical nature of the song’s cover art, which featured a map of Drake's home with sex offender markers, and stated that Drake himself had previously participated in similar insults against Lamar. Drake’s legal team argued that the song caused harm and violence, including a shooting at his home, and that UMG was profiting from dangerous misinformation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/17/arts/music/umg-response-drake-lawsuit.html?searchResultPosition=1
Arts
Supreme Court Revives Long-Running Nazi Art Restitution Case
The U.S. Supreme Court has revived a long-running Nazi restitution case involving Camille Pissarro’s painting, Rue Saint-Honoré in the Afternoon, “Effect of Rain”, which was seized from a Jewish owner during World War II and is now held in a Spanish museum. After a federal court ruled in 2024 that Spanish law applied—allowing the museum to retain the painting—California passed a new law requiring the return of Nazi-looted art to original owners. The Supreme Court’s decision sends the case back to a California federal court for reconsideration under the new law, renewing the heirs' legal battle for restitution.
Trump Moves to Dismantle 7 Federal Agencies, Including Key Library, Museum, and Media Funds
Trump signed an executive order to dismantle seven federal agencies, including those overseeing Voice of America (VOA) and other government-funded media outlets, with the aim of cutting non-mandatory functions and reducing required ones. The targeted agencies include the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), which supports libraries, museums, and archives, and the U.S. Agency for Global Media, which provides independent journalism to global audiences. The order also threatens the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, the Woodrow Wilson Center, the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness, and several financial support programs for struggling communities. The move is part of a broader effort to reduce the federal government, though it faces legal challenges, including a recent injunction against similar cuts. Agency leaders have seven days to submit compliance plans, but further legal and political conflicts are anticipated.
Art Adviser Sentenced to 2.5 Years in Prison for Defrauding Clients
Lisa Schiff, a Manhattan art adviser, was sentenced to 2.5 years in federal prison for defrauding clients of her advisory firm out of approximately $6.5 million. Schiff, who cultivated close relationships with her clients, diverted funds they entrusted to her for art purchases to fund her luxurious lifestyle, including shopping sprees and chartered helicopters. The scheme, which involved about 55 artworks, began in 2018 and continued until 2023 when clients confronted her, leading to her surrender to authorities. Schiff pleaded guilty to wire fraud and will also be required to pay restitution of over $9 million. The case has shaken the art world, where she was once regarded as an ethical authority.
Two Men Found Guilty in Theft of $6 Million Gold Toilet
Two men were found guilty of stealing and selling Maurizio Cattelan’s 18-karat gold toilet, titled “America”, which was stolen from Blenheim Palace in 2019. The fully functional artwork, valued at $6 million, was taken in a daring five-minute raid that caused a flood in the historic estate. The stolen toilet was believed to have been melted down and sold in fragments. A third man had previously pleaded guilty, while a fourth defendant, a jeweler, was acquitted. Cattelan, known for provocative art, dismissed theories that he orchestrated the theft, calling it “one of the most bizarre” crimes.
A $300 Million Art Trove and the Labyrinth of Nazi-Era Art Claims
The long-running dispute over the Guelph Treasure, a collection of medieval ecclesiastical artifacts worth $300 million, has taken a new turn with the discovery of documents suggesting its 1935 sale was made under Nazi duress. The heirs of Alice Koch, a Jewish art dealer forced to pay a punitive tax before fleeing Germany, have filed a new restitution claim, complicating an already tangled case involving multiple claimants. Germany’s plan to replace its advisory panel on Nazi-looted art with a binding arbitration tribunal further adds uncertainty to the resolution. The Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation, which currently holds the treasure, has agreed to a hearing in light of the new evidence, while the future of restitution procedures in Germany remains in flux.
Van Gogh or Faux? Weeding Out Fakes Is Starting to Take a Toll.
The Van Gogh Museum, a leading authority on the artist's works, is rethinking its role in authenticating potential Van Gogh paintings due to an increase in lawsuits and a surge of requests during the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2021, art collector Stuart Pivar sued the museum for rejecting his painting "Auvers, 1890," claiming that its decision devalued the artwork. The museum’s stance is that it must avoid becoming embroiled in costly litigation, as its authentication decisions are influential in the art market, especially for high-value works. As lawsuits pile up and demands for validation grow, the museum has limited its authentication services to accredited dealers and auction houses, leading to increased reliance on new technologies like artificial intelligence for art verification. While some scholars argue for a broader, more open approach to authentication, the Van Gogh Museum continues to uphold its cautious position, emphasizing that its decisions are opinions that may evolve over time.
Dismayed by Trump, the Star Pianist András Schiff Boycotts the U.S.
Renowned pianist András Schiff announced that he will no longer perform in the United States, citing concerns over President Trump’s leadership, including his treatment of Ukraine, expansionist rhetoric, and support for far-right politicians. Schiff, who has boycotted Russia and Hungary due to autocratic rule, likened Trump’s immigration policies to the deportations of Jews during World War II, which his family experienced. He canceled planned performances with major U.S. orchestras, joining a growing cultural boycott by artists critical of America’s political trajectory.
Sports
Tennis Antitrust Lawsuit: the Professional Tennis Players Association Sues ATP and Women’s Tennis Association Tours
The Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA), co-founded by Novak Djokovic, has filed a lawsuit in New York, London, and Brussels against the ATP, Women’s Tennis Association (WTA), the International Tennis Federation (ITF), and the International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA), accusing them of violating antitrust laws by monopolizing control over professional tennis, suppressing player earnings, limiting opportunities for rival tournaments, and restricting player autonomy. The PTPA argues that these governing bodies abuse their power to prioritize personal profits over the welfare of players and fans, using tactics such as price-fixing, limiting prize money, and enforcing unfair arbitration clauses. The lawsuit seeks to overturn the current structure of the sport, advocating for more player rights, fair compensation, and reform in how tennis operates, with the PTPA emphasizing that this action is necessary to address unsustainable conditions in professional tennis.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6210341/2025/03/18/tennis-lawsuit-antitrust-atp-wta-novak-djokovic/
White House Plans to Pause $175 Million for the University of Pennsylvania Over Transgender Policy
The Trump administration announced it would suspend about $175 million in federal funding to the University of Pennsylvania, citing the school's policies regarding transgender athletes, particularly its past support for Lia Thomas, a transgender woman who competed on the women's swim team. This suspension is part of the administration's broader campaign against transgender inclusion in sports and an escalating conflict with elite universities. The move follows a similar action against Columbia University and intensifies scrutiny on other universities facing federal funding cuts. Penn, which has already faced financial challenges, expressed concern over the impact of these cuts on its operations, particularly in medical sciences.
In Sports-Crazed Boston, a Fight Over a Women’s Soccer Stadium
Renovation plans for White Stadium in Boston—a potential home for a new professional women’s soccer team—have ignited fierce debate among local stakeholders. Mayor Michelle Wu and supporters argue that the $191 million project is a vital investment in public school facilities and neighborhood revitalization, while opponents, including mayoral candidate Josh Kraft (son of a New England Patriots owner), contend that using nearly $100 million of public funds to benefit a private venture amounts to an inappropriate money grab in a historically marginalized community. Meanwhile, the dispute is further complicated by the Kraft Group’s separate effort to build a new stadium for the New England Revolution in nearby Everett, raising additional concerns over community impact and equitable resource allocation.
Ex-Michigan Football Offensive Coordinator Matt Weiss Charged With Unauthorized Computer Access and Identity Theft
Former Michigan offensive coordinator Matt Weiss has been indicted on 24 counts, including 14 counts of unauthorized computer access and 10 counts of aggravated identity theft, for hacking into the email, social media, and cloud storage accounts of over 3,300 students and athletes across more than 100 colleges. Between 2015 and 2023, Weiss allegedly exploited a third-party database and used compromised athletic department credentials to download personal information, intimate photos, and medical data of more than 150,000 athletes, as well as additional students and alumni. The indictment alleges that Weiss also reset and accessed email accounts from the University of Michigan and Westmont College, and kept detailed notes on the intimate content he viewed, leading to significant legal consequences including potential prison sentences for each charge.
Celtics Sold for $6.1 Billion, the Highest Price in North American Sports History
Bill Chisholm, managing partner of Symphony Technology Group (STG), has reached an agreement to purchase the Boston Celtics for $6.1 billion, marking the largest sale price for a North American sports franchise. Chisholm, a lifelong Celtics fan, will take over ownership, with current CEO Wyc Grousbeck remaining in charge until the 2027-2028 season. The sale reflects a shift in NBA ownership and could influence future franchise valuations, particularly as the league considers expansion. The sale is also significant for the NBA’s potential expansion plans, with cities like Las Vegas and Seattle considered front-runners for new teams.
Mexico City Bans Traditional Bullfights for Violence-Free Option
Mexico City lawmakers voted overwhelmingly to ban traditional bullfighting, prohibiting the injuring or killing of bulls for sport within or outside the arenas. The new law, which received broad support from officials including President Claudia Sheinbaum, allows for a modified version of bullfighting where only capes are used and bullfights are limited to 15 minutes with a maximum of six fights per event. While animal rights groups celebrated the legislation, they argued that it didn’t go far enough, pushing for a complete abolition of the practice. Proponents of bullfighting protested the decision, arguing that it undermines a deeply rooted cultural tradition. This legislation follows increasing global opposition to bullfighting, with several Mexican states already banning the practice.
Media/Technology
Google Calls for Weakened Copyright and Export Rules in AI Policy Proposal
Google’s AI policy proposal, submitted in response to the Trump administration’s AI Action Plan, advocates for weakened copyright restrictions on AI training and “balanced” export controls to protect national security while supporting global business operations. The company argues that fair use and text-and-data mining exceptions are crucial for AI innovation, allowing AI developers to train on publicly available copyrighted material without significant restrictions, despite ongoing lawsuits challenging this practice. Google also opposes stringent export controls that were imposed under the Biden administration, warning they could harm U.S. competitiveness. Additionally, the proposal calls for increased federal investment in AI R&D, the release of government datasets for commercial training, and a standardized national AI policy to replace fragmented state regulations. Google resists AI liability obligations and disclosure requirements, cautioning against transparency laws that could expose trade secrets or compromise national security.
Big Tech Tells Trump Admin that Copyright is a Barrier to AI Development
In response to the "AI Action Plan," OpenAI submitted comments to the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) that were heavily criticized for advocating the unrestricted use of copyrighted works in training AI models, under the guise of promoting innovation and national security. OpenAI argued that AI development, which relies on machine learning from vast datasets of unlicensed copyrighted materials, should be exempt from copyright laws, especially the fair use doctrine. Critics contend that this approach undermines creators’ rights and misrepresents the implications of fair use, while also suggesting that the U.S. should emulate the Chinese model of disregarding creators' rights to compete in the AI arms race. The company's stance was criticized for disregarding the value of copyright industries and promoting a tech-utopian vision that fails to address the broader consequences of such unchecked AI development.
https://illusionofmore.com/big-tech-tells-trump-admin-that-copyright-is-a-barrier-to-ai-development/
Everything You Say to Your Echo Will Soon Be Sent to Amazon, and You Can’t Opt Out
Amazon is removing its "Do Not Send Voice Recordings" privacy feature from Echo devices on March 28, as part of its push to promote Alexa+, a new subscription service. This change means that all voice commands made to Alexa will be processed in Amazon's cloud, eliminating users' ability to keep recordings local. The move aligns with the rollout of new generative AI features, including Alexa Voice ID, which recognizes individual voices but requires voice recordings to be stored. While Amazon assures users that recordings will be deleted after processing, it acknowledges that those who opt out of storing voice recordings will lose access to the Voice ID feature. The shift raises privacy concerns, especially given Amazon's past issues with managing voice recordings and allowing employees to listen to them, but the company is betting that Alexa+ will revitalize its voice assistant business despite these trade-offs.
Jury Orders Greenpeace to Pay Pipeline Company More Than $660 Million
A North Dakota jury has awarded Energy Transfer over $660 million in damages against Greenpeace for its involvement in protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline nearly a decade ago, a verdict that far exceeds the estimated $300 million damage the environmental group warned could force it out of U.S. operations. Greenpeace, which maintained it played only a minor role in demonstrations led by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, decried the lawsuit as a strategic effort to stifle free speech and environmental activism. The trial, which examined claims including trespass, defamation, and conspiracy, has ignited concerns among free speech advocates that such rulings could have a chilling effect on peaceful protest rights and undermine the protection of civil liberties.
Elon Musk’s Starlink Expands Across White House Complex
Starlink, the satellite internet service operated by Elon Musk's SpaceX, has been installed at the White House to improve Wi-Fi connectivity on the campus, addressing areas with poor cell service and overtaxed Wi-Fi infrastructure. This installation is part of broader efforts to modernize government technology, particularly under Musk’s advisory role in the Trump administration. The Starlink system, routed through a White House data center rather than physical terminals on the campus, raises questions about security and ethics, as Musk’s companies have business dealings with the federal government. Despite concerns about security risks, officials emphasize that the system is meant to improve internet access without compromising existing infrastructure.
As Voice of America Goes Dark, Some Broadcasts Are Replaced by Music
Trump’s executive order to dismantle the agency overseeing Voice of America (VOA) is part of a broader effort to weaken the news media. Following the order, hundreds of VOA employees were placed on paid leave, losing access to their work, which disrupted broadcasts in regions where VOA served as a counterbalance to state-controlled media. The administration has long criticized VOA for alleged liberal bias, previously attempting to align it with Trump’s agenda. The move has sparked legal challenges and pushback from advocacy groups defending press freedom. Critics warn that shutting down VOA undermines its decades-long role in promoting democracy and countering authoritarian propaganda.
Chinese Nationalists Praise Trump’s Cuts to Voice of America
Chinese state media has expressed satisfaction over budget cuts to VOA and Radio Free Asia (RFA), U.S.-funded outlets that have long been criticized by Beijing for their coverage of human rights abuses in China. These outlets, which have provided crucial news in languages like Mandarin and Uyghur, have faced censorship and retaliation from the Chinese government for their reporting on sensitive issues such as the Tiananmen Square massacre and the situation in Xinjiang. The Chinese government views the reduction of these outlets' influence as a victory, while critics argue that it undermines the U.S.'s role in promoting free expression and supporting dissidents in China.
General News
With New Decree, Trump Seeks to Cow the Legal Profession
Trump issued a presidential memorandum targeting lawyers and law firms that challenge his administration, threatening sanctions against those who engage in what he considers frivolous or vexatious litigation. The memo expands his ongoing campaign to retaliate against firms and attorneys critical of him, specifically singling out lawyer Marc Elias and his involvement in high-profile legal battles against the president. The memorandum directs the Justice and Homeland Security Departments to seek punitive actions against lawyers involved in cases against the government, particularly in matters of national security, immigration, or election integrity. Critics argue that the memo undermines the legal system and threatens lawyers' ability to represent clients without fear of retribution, with some law firms pledging not to back down, despite the threats.
Law Firm Bends in Face of Trump Demands
Paul Weiss resolved its dispute with the Trump administration by agreeing to a set of commitments after a face-to-face meeting between its chairman, Brad Karp, and Trump at the White House. In exchange for Trump dropping an executive order targeting the firm, Paul Weiss committed to representing clients regardless of their political leanings, providing $40 million in legal services for initiatives such as the President’s Task Force to Combat Antisemitism, and performing an audit to ensure that its hiring practices remain merit-based without adopting any DEI policies.
Paul Weiss Chair Says Deal With Trump Adheres to Firm’s Principles
Brad Karp, chairman of the law firm Paul Weiss, reassured employees that its agreement was consistent with the firm’s long-standing principles. As part of the agreement, Paul Weiss committed to $40 million in pro bono work supporting causes aligned with the Trump administration, such as veterans and combating antisemitism. While Karp emphasized that the firm was reaffirming its commitment to fairness and diversity in hiring, the deal sparked concerns within the legal community that large law firms were acquiescing to Trump’s demands instead of challenging them legally.
Trump Administration Questions Law Firms Over DEI Employment Practices
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), under President Trump’s administration, has sent letters to 20 major law firms, including Kirkland & Ellis and Sidley Austin, requesting information about their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices, suggesting these programs may violate civil rights laws by discriminating against white candidates. This move aligns with Trump’s broader efforts to dismantle DEI initiatives, which he calls “illegal and immoral discrimination,” and comes amid his retribution against law firms linked to investigations into him. Critics argue the scrutiny misrepresents DEI’s purpose, which is to expand hiring opportunities. The EEOC has also set up a tip line for reporting “potentially unlawful DEI practices” and recently dropped cases protecting transgender workers, further signaling a shift away from previous workplace protections.
Justice Department Stonewalls Federal Judge Over Deportation Flights
The Trump administration clashed with the judiciary after deporting over 200 individuals, including alleged members of a Venezuelan criminal gang, despite a federal judge’s order halting the flights. The government argued that the deportations were justified under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which grants the president broad powers to remove noncitizens during wartime. However, Judge James E. Boasberg sought clarity on whether the deportations violated his ruling and demanded details from the Justice Department, which resisted providing specifics, citing national security. Tensions escalated as White House officials, including border czar Tom Homan, expressed defiance, and the administration sought to have the judge removed from the case. This incident exemplifies growing friction between the Trump administration and the judiciary, with critics accusing the president of undermining the courts’ authority and disregarding due process.
Administration Officials Believe Order Lets Immigration Agents Enter Homes Without Warrants
Trump administration lawyers have interpreted the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act to potentially allow warrantless home entries for deporting suspected members of a Venezuelan gang, a move that bypasses the Fourth Amendment’s requirement for a judicial warrant. Experts warn that applying this wartime law in peacetime to target undocumented immigrants could severely infringe on civil liberties and privacy rights, drawing comparisons to historical abuses during major wars. The administration’s aggressive use of presidential power in this context has already resulted in the deportation of over 100 Venezuelan citizens, and a federal judge has temporarily halted such actions pending further legal review.
Judges Fear for Their Safety Amid a Wave of Threats
Trump’s call for the impeachment of a federal judge who ruled against his administration on deportation flights has intensified threats and harassment against judges, including social media attacks, bomb threats, and “swatting” incidents. The judiciary is raising alarms over escalating dangers, especially as judges preside over high-profile cases involving Trump’s policies. While the U.S. Marshals Service reports a decline in investigated threats over the past two years, Chief Justice John Roberts and other judges warn of a troubling increase in hostility against the judiciary. Trump’s rhetoric, amplified by allies and social media figures, has led to personal attacks on judges and their families, undermining judicial independence and public trust in the legal system.
White House Denies Violating Judge’s Order in Deporting Venezuelans
The Trump administration defended its decision to deport hundreds of Venezuelan immigrants to a prison in El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, despite a court order blocking such deportations. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt argued that federal courts have no jurisdiction over the president’s foreign affairs decisions. Judge James E. Boasberg issued a temporary restraining order halting the deportations, but the administration claimed that some migrants had already been removed before the order took effect. El Salvador’s president, Nayib Bukele, shared footage of detainees being processed, while Venezuela condemned the action as a crime against humanity. The U.S. also transferred suspected gang members from MS-13 and the Tren de Aragua to El Salvador as part of a broader agreement, raising concerns about due process and human rights violations under Bukele’s harsh anti-gang policies.
Trump Administration Halts Funding for Legal Representation of Migrant Children
The Trump administration's decision to cancel a contract that funds legal representation for over 25,000 unaccompanied minors crossing the U.S. border could leave many children vulnerable to swift deportation without legal counsel. This move, which halts the work of over 100 nonprofit organizations, threatens to fast-track children's immigration cases, leaving them exposed in adversarial proceedings. Many of these minors, including young children who have survived trauma and abuse, may be deported to countries where they face danger. Advocates argue that without legal representation, children are unlikely to navigate the complex immigration system effectively, jeopardizing their chances of remaining in the U.S.
Trump Shuts Down Three Watchdog Agencies Overseeing Immigration Crackdown
The Trump administration has shut down three key watchdog agencies within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), including the civil rights office and two ombudsman offices, which were responsible for overseeing immigration detention and legal immigration policies. This move, which results in the loss of over 100 jobs, comes as the administration intensifies its deportation efforts and aims to eliminate oversight that could challenge its aggressive immigration policies. The decision has drawn criticism, with opponents arguing it undermines transparency and civil rights protections, while DHS officials claim it streamlines enforcement efforts. The closures align with broader efforts by the Trump administration to remove bureaucratic obstacles and eliminate government offices, a strategy supported by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Critics warn that this signals a disregard for oversight and accountability in the administration's policies.
Judge Temporarily Stops EPA From Clawing Back $14 Billion in Climate Grants
A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order blocking the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from withdrawing $14 billion in climate grant funding held at Citibank, which had been in limbo since late last year. The funding had become embroiled in controversy after EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin raised concerns about potential fraud and political favoritism in the selection of recipients under the Biden administration. The funds were frozen in mid-February following requests from the Trump administration. Judge Tanya S. Chutkan ruled that the EPA lacked credible evidence to justify blocking the grants and failed to follow the proper procedures for cancellation. As a result, the EPA cannot proceed with terminating the grants until the case is resolved, though the ruling did not grant immediate access to the funds for recipients. Some nonprofit organizations, like Climate United, which was set to receive nearly $7 billion, have faced financial strain due to the freeze. The organization has expressed optimism following the ruling, planning to seek further action to release the funds.
Musk’s Role in Dismantling Aid Agency Likely Violated Constitution, Judge Finds
A federal judge, Theodore D. Chuang, ruled that Elon Musk's involvement in attempting to shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development (U.S.A.I.D.) violated the Constitution and bypassed Congress's authority over such actions. This decision marked the first time a judge directly acted to limit Musk's influence on executive agencies. Chuang found that Musk had improperly asserted power over the agency without formal appointment by Trump, violating the appointments clause. The judge ordered the partial restoration of U.S.A.I.D.'s operations, including reinstating email access for employees and halting further shutdown actions. The ruling came after Musk's team, under the DOGE, had drastically reduced U.S.A.I.D.'s workforce and cancelled many of its programs, with Musk publicly celebrating the dismantling of the agency. The decision also pointed to Musk's unauthorized control over various departments, including Education, National Institutes of Health, and Energy, further cementing the unlawfulness of his actions.
Judge Blocks Policy That Would Expel Transgender Troops
A federal judge blocked the Trump administration's ban on transgender people serving in the military, allowing trans service members to continue serving under rules set by the Biden administration. Judge Ana C. Reyes issued an injunction, citing violations of the Fifth Amendment and a lack of evidence supporting the ban. The judge criticized the government's reasoning and dismissed the ban as illogical and discriminatory. The ruling comes amid ongoing legal battles over transgender military service, with trans service members claiming the ban disrupted their careers and lives. Military leaders have opposed the ban, while the Trump administration has aimed to roll back diversity efforts within the military.
Trump Fires Democrats on Federal Trade Commission
Trump fired two Democratic members of the Federal Trade Commission, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya, in a move that challenges the traditional independence of the regulatory body and is expected to face legal challenges. The firings follow an executive order granting the White House more authority over independent agencies, sparking concerns about political influence over regulatory decisions. Slaughter and Bedoya, who have been vocal about consumer protection and antitrust issues, argue that their removal violates Supreme Court precedent protecting independent regulators. The Justice Department has shifted its stance on these protections, reinforcing Trump's authority to dismiss commissioners. Critics, including Senator Amy Klobuchar, warn that the decision undermines consumer rights and benefits corporate interests.
Justice Dept. Tries to Intervene on Trump’s Behalf in Jan. 6 Lawsuits
The U.S. Justice Department recently filed a legal motion to shield Trump from civil lawsuits related to the January 6th attack, arguing that he was acting in his official capacity as president on that day. If successful, this maneuver could have the federal government replace Trump as the defendant, protecting him from legal and financial repercussions. The lawsuits, filed by Capitol Police officers and lawmakers who were injured during the attack, are the last remaining effort to hold Trump accountable after two criminal cases related to January 6th were dismissed. However, whether Trump was performing official presidential duties or acting as a candidate is still being debated, with a federal judge set to rule on the matter.
Trump Signs Order Aimed at Eliminating Education Dept. ‘Once and for All’
Trump signed an executive order directing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to begin dismantling the U.S. Department of Education, citing poor test scores as a justification. However, the order faces significant legal challenges, as only Congress can shut down a federal department, according to the U.S. Constitution. While the order mandates the continuation of critical functions like federal student aid and special education funding, it also presents a contradiction by attempting to eliminate the department while still adhering to federal laws. The move has sparked backlash from Democrats, education groups, and legal experts, who argue that it undermines protections for vulnerable students and oversteps executive power. The battle will likely lead to a political and legal showdown over the future of federal education oversight.
Trump Cleaves Student Loan and Special Education Services From Education Dept.
Trump announced a major restructuring of the Education Department, transferring its core functions—such as student loan administration and special education services—to other federal agencies. Student loans will move to the Small Business Administration (SBA), while special education programs and nutrition services will be reassigned to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Critics, including education experts and unions, questioned whether Trump had the legal authority to make these changes without congressional approval, arguing that the reorganization could create more confusion and disruption for students.
Food Safety Jeopardized by Onslaught of Funding and Staff Cuts
With reduced resources, agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) are struggling to carry out essential inspections, investigations, and enforcement activities. These cuts are compounded by an increasing volume of food products, complex global supply chains, and emerging foodborne illness risks, raising concerns about the ability to prevent outbreaks and ensure food safety. The article emphasizes that these reductions could put public health at greater risk, especially as foodborne illnesses remain a major public health concern.
Kennedy’s Alarming Prescription for Bird Flu on Poultry Farms
Health officials, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr., have proposed an unorthodox strategy for managing the H5N1 bird flu by allowing the virus to run its course through poultry flocks in order to identify potentially immune birds, rather than immediately culling infected ones. However, veterinarians and scientists warn that this approach would be inhumane and dangerous, as it could lead to severe animal suffering, provide numerous opportunities for the virus to mutate, and trigger significant economic losses due to prolonged quarantines and potential trade embargoes. Experts also note that the genetic uniformity of farmed birds makes the emergence of naturally immune individuals highly unlikely, emphasizing that strengthened biosecurity remains the safer and more responsible solution.
Musk’s Team Evicts Officials at the U.S. Institute of Peace
A tense standoff between DOGE and the U.S. Institute of Peace unfolded when Elon Musk’s team attempted to take control of the agency following Trump’s executive order to dismantle it. The institute, a congressionally chartered nonprofit, resisted the takeover, asserting that it was not part of the executive branch and was protected by law. Police and FBI agents were involved as Musk’s team, led by Kenneth Jackson, tried to remove the institute’s officials, including the acting president George Moose, who is challenging his dismissal. The dispute escalated after multiple failed attempts to access the institute’s headquarters, culminating in a dramatic police intervention, with Musk's team ultimately entering the building with the assistance of law enforcement. The institute’s leadership vowed to fight the illegal eviction in court.
DOGE Reverses Move That Made Its Claims Nearly Impossible to Check
DOGE reversed its decision to remove identifying information from canceled federal grants after being called out for making its claims harder to fact-check. Initially, the group had posted vague details about canceled grants and removed identifiers from the public source code, making it difficult to verify the accuracy of its reported savings. After backlash, DOGE re-added some details, linking the grants to the federal spending database. However, the group's claims were still found to be inaccurate.
The Women Most Affected by Abortion Bans
A new study analyzing birth data from 2023 reveals that abortion bans following the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade effectively prevented some women from obtaining abortions, particularly among Black and Hispanic women, women without a college degree, and those living far from clinics. The study shows that for women in states with abortion bans, the distance to the nearest clinic increased significantly, resulting in a 2.8% rise in births, with the effect being most pronounced in women of color and those in less accessible areas. Despite an overall increase in abortion access through telehealth and financial aid, many women, particularly those with fewer resources, struggled to overcome the barriers posed by bans, leading to increased births. While the increase in births was relatively small, it indicates that some women were unable to access abortion care and forced to carry pregnancies to term. The research highlights how abortion bans exacerbate inequality in access to reproductive care, especially for marginalized populations.
Texas Arrests Midwife and Associate on Charges of Providing Abortions
Maria Margarita Rojas and her associate, Jose Ley, were arrested in greater Houston on charges of illegally performing abortions—a second-degree felony—and practicing medicine without a license, marking what appears to be the first criminal case against abortion providers in Texas since the overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022. Rojas, who operated several clinics in and around Houston, was apprehended while en route to one of her clinics, and although she was initially held on a lower bond for practicing without a license, additional charges for performing abortions were later added. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton emphasized his commitment to enforcing pro-life laws, while local authorities and court records detailed previous instances where Rojas was accused of attempting or performing abortions on different occasions.
Trump Administration Dropped Policy Prohibiting Contractors From Having Segregated Facilities
The Trump administration has removed a long-standing civil rights provision that prohibited federal contractors from maintaining segregated facilities, such as restrooms, work areas, and lunchrooms. This change, outlined in a memo from the General Services Administration (GSA), is part of a broader effort to dismantle DEI policies. While the Civil Rights Act of 1964 still prohibits segregation, civil rights groups fear that this move signals a weakening of federal enforcement. Critics argue that the removal undermines progress on equity and inclusion, particularly for marginalized groups. The administration defended the change as part of a broader initiative to streamline federal contracting and reduce bureaucratic barriers, but the decision has drawn backlash from civil rights advocates.
NASA Astronauts’ Nine-Month Orbital Odyssey Ends in a Splashdown
NASA astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore returned to Earth after a much longer-than-planned mission in space, which began in June. Originally intended as an eight-day trip to the International Space Station (ISS), the mission was delayed for nearly nine months due to issues with Starliner's propulsion system. The astronauts were brought back by SpaceX's Crew Dragon capsule, which safely splashed down off Florida's Gulf Coast. Despite some political controversy surrounding the delay, with Trump claiming the Biden administration had stranded the astronauts, Williams and Wilmore emphasized that they never felt "stuck" in space. Their mission involved significant research and maintenance work on the ISS, and while their extended stay was unexpected, they maintained a positive outlook.
Trump Rejects Idea That Musk Should Have Access to Top-Secret China War Plans
Trump rejected the idea that Elon Musk should have access to U.S. military plans regarding a potential conflict with China, following a report that Musk was scheduled for a top-secret briefing at the Pentagon. The briefing was initially planned to include high-ranking military officials discussing the U.S. strategy for countering China, but it was canceled after the story became public. Trump criticized the idea of showing sensitive military information to Musk, citing his business interests in China, and called the report "fake." Musk, who has contracts with the Defense Department, met privately with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Admiral Christopher W. Grady instead. Trump clarified that Musk's visit was about discussing efficiencies within the Pentagon and was not a classified briefing.
Government Science Data May Soon Be Hidden. They’re Racing to Copy It.
In recent months, the Trump administration has removed vast amounts of climate, environmental, and public health data from federal websites, significantly limiting public access to these crucial resources. In response, volunteers from various organizations, including the Environmental Data and Governance Initiative, have worked to retrieve and archive this data, preserving it for future use. While some datasets, like those from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), remain intact, critical tools, such as the Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool and the Environmental Justice Screening Tool have been deleted. These actions, seen as attempts to diminish access to environmental justice and climate data, have been met with legal challenges, with some groups successfully restoring specific tools. Volunteers continue to work on saving as much data as possible, but concerns remain about the long-term viability of these efforts and the potential halt in data updates.
Legal Experts Question Trump’s Authority to Cancel Columbia’s Funding
The Trump administration has revoked $400 million in federal funding to Columbia University, citing alleged failures to prevent antisemitic harassment, and has demanded sweeping institutional changes before reconsidering reinstatement. Critics, including legal scholars and Columbia’s former president Lee C. Bollinger, argue that the move is an unprecedented government overreach that threatens academic freedom and likely violates constitutional protections under the First Amendment and civil rights law. The administration’s demands include redefining antisemitism, restricting protest activities, and placing an academic department under government oversight. Experts warn that the administration bypassed legal procedures designed to ensure due process, making this action a potentially unlawful intrusion into university governance.
Academia Confronts a Watershed Moment at Columbia, and the Right Revels
Columbia University has agreed to overhaul its protest policies and security practices in response to the Trump administration's threat to withhold $400 million in federal funding. The university's concessions include hiring a security force with arrest powers and placing its Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies Department under increased oversight. While some view this as a surrender to government demands, others see it as necessary to protect the institution’s funding. This decision has sparked strong reactions, with many academic leaders expressing concerns about the erosion of academic freedom. The government's actions, particularly regarding antisemitism and campus protests, could set a precedent for other universities.
How the G.O.P. Went From Championing Campus Free Speech to Fighting It
Conservatives who once championed free speech on college campuses are now leading efforts to restrict political expression in universities, using state and federal power to suppress what they see as harmful or objectionable content. The Trump administration and Republican lawmakers have enacted measures to control campus discourse, including withholding federal funding from institutions they claim fail to protect students, banning certain symbols and drag performances, and restricting classroom discussions on race and gender. Critics, including some conservatives, argue that these actions mirror the censorship they previously condemned. Legal experts warn this governmental overreach threatens academic freedom and the First Amendment, particularly in cases like the deportation of student activists and restrictions on noncitizens' speech.
Judge Says Khalil’s Deportation Case Can Be Heard in New Jersey
The Trump administration has attempted to deport Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate and pro-Palestinian activist, despite his status as a legal permanent resident with no criminal charges against him. Khalil was detained earlier this month and transferred across multiple states, including Louisiana, as the administration seeks his deportation. The government claims Khalil spread antisemitism and supported Hamas, while his lawyers argue he is being retaliated against for his advocacy of Palestinian rights. A New York federal judge moved the case to New Jersey, where Khalil’s legal team is fighting his detention, with a focus on First and Fifth Amendment violations, and they have secured an order to prevent his deportation.
On Its Website, DOGE Deletes More Than 100 Government Leases It Said Were Canceled
DOGE revised its claims of cost savings from eliminating federal office leases, reducing the reported savings by nearly 30% after removing 136 lease terminations. The change followed internal pushback from various federal agencies and lawmakers, particularly from the Trump administration, which resulted in some lease cancellations being reversed. For instance, the Army Corps of Engineers and agencies like the National Weather Service, the Indian Health Service, and the Social Security Administration received support to keep their office spaces. Despite these setbacks, DOGE continues to list some lease terminations, but the overall situation remains fluid, with the General Services Administration reviewing its real estate decisions.
Inside the 24-Hour Scramble Among Top National Security Officials Over the J.F.K. Documents Trump announced that he would release 80,000 pages of documents related to President John F. Kennedy’s assassination with just 24 hours' notice, causing confusion and urgency within his national security team and the release of personally identifiable information. The documents, which had been in the works for declassification since January, were mostly released by the following evening, though some officials raised concerns about the risks of releasing sensitive information. CIA Director John Ratcliffe warned that some files were unrelated to Kennedy's death and were created years after the assassination. Despite some errors in the files, Trump presented the release as a fulfillment of his long-standing promise, responding to public pressure from historians and conspiracy theorists who have long sought these documents.
Justice Dept. Moves to Release Surveillance Records of Martin Luther King Jr.
The Justice Department, following an executive order from Trump, is seeking to unseal F.B.I. surveillance records on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. nearly two years ahead of their court-ordered release, despite opposition from the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and King’s family. The records, which include wiretaps and reports from the F.B.I.’s surveillance campaign, were originally sealed until 2027 as part of a legal compromise. Concerns have been raised that the files, potentially containing biased or fabricated accounts, may be used to tarnish King’s legacy, as past releases have included salacious details gathered during J. Edgar Hoover’s attempts to discredit civil rights leaders. While the administration claims a public interest in the truth about King’s assassination, critics view the move as politically motivated, especially given Trump’s history of dismantling civil rights initiatives. The King family has requested to review the files before public release but has not received a response.
Trump Official Pushes Congestion Pricing Deadline Back a Month
Federal transportation officials, under pressure from the Trump administration, demanded that New York end its congestion pricing program by Friday, but after New York's defiance, Secretary Sean Duffy granted a 30‑day extension while warning of further repercussions. The program, which reduces traffic and raises funds for transit improvements by charging vehicles entering Manhattan’s congestion zone, has become a flashpoint between federal authority and New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority and Governor Kathy Hochul. Despite legal challenges and criticism that the tolls burden drivers outside Manhattan, the MTA remains committed to the plan, arguing that the program’s early results—such as reduced vehicle numbers and improved public safety—demonstrate its success, setting the stage for a prolonged legal and political battle.
Top State Court Rules That New York City Can’t Allow Noncitizens to Vote
The New York State Court of Appeals upheld a lower-court ruling that struck down a New York City law allowing noncitizens—specifically legal permanent residents—to vote in local elections, ruling that citizenship is a constitutional requirement for voter eligibility. The 6-1 decision, authored by Chief Judge Rowan D. Wilson, emphasized that the state constitution limits the franchise to citizens, despite arguments that the measure could have expanded democratic participation for the city’s 800,000 legal permanent residents. While dissenting opinions suggested that noncitizens should have a voice in local governance, they agreed that any change to voting qualifications should be decided through a referendum.
With Orders, Investigations and Innuendo, Trump and G.O.P. Aim to Cripple the Left
Trump and his allies are mounting an aggressive campaign targeting the financial, digital, and legal infrastructure that supports the Democratic Party. This includes investigating major Democratic fundraising platforms like ActBlue, scrutinizing nonprofit groups aligned with Democrats, and threatening to revoke tax exemptions for organizations critical of Trump. The administration has also targeted prominent Democratic law firms, including Perkins Coie, Covington & Burling, and Paul Weiss, with executive orders that have already caused significant financial losses and restricted their business activities. Critics argue that these actions represent a systematic attempt to weaken the Democratic Party’s ability to compete in future elections, with some accusing Trump of using government power to exact retribution against political opponents. The White House and Trump’s allies insist these moves are justified by their belief that the left’s political operations are unethical or unlawful.
Comments